Already a member?
Sign in
Cryptozoology Photos
A collection of images of animals which fall outside the contemporary zoological classification
Cryptozoology "The study of hidden animals" consists of mysterious animals more often known as "Cryptids." Typically classified as "Pseudoscience," this field of research often focuses on local, urban and folkloric sources. It also often includes sightings of travelers, explorers or natives passed through word of mouth, journals or literary traditions. Cryptozoology Photos showcase these animals that has gotten quite a reputation of being enigmatic, mysterious and unknown.Bigfoot -Big-apelike creature in the North American Folklore. Also known as Sasquatch. | |
Chupacabra - from the Spanish word Chupar meaning "to suck." A cryptid presumed to have existed in America. | |
Loch Ness Monster -one of the best known animals studied in Cryptozoology, an alleged monster believed to be dwelling into the deep waters of Scotland's Loch Ness. | |
Mothman - a winged man-like creature described to have reflective red eyes and huge moth-like wings. Reported seen in Charleston and Point Pleasant, West Virginia. |
Latest page update: made by Ravenite
, May 19 2008, 10:41 AM EDT
(about this update
About This Update
Edited by Ravenite
4 words deleted
1 widget deleted
view changes
- complete history)
4 words deleted
1 widget deleted
view changes
- complete history)
Keyword tags: None
More Info: links to this page
| Started By | Thread Subject | Replies | Last Post | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonymous | Why? | 6 | Jul 1 2008, 12:25 PM EDT by Anonymous | |
|
|
Thread started: Apr 8 2008, 1:50 PM EDT
Watch
Why wouldnt anyone not believe in mythical creatures? Because they are mythical? Thats no excuse.
3
out of
5 found this valuable.
Do you?
Keyword tags: None
(edit keyword tags)
|
|||
| Ravenite | Nessie Caught On Tape | 2 | May 16 2008, 11:07 PM EDT by Vyrie | |
|
Thread started: May 10 2008, 11:00 AM EDT
Watch
Again, another claim yet nothing concrete to prove anything. The tape just shows a black moving blot on the water's surface. There seems to be NO distinctive features at all. It could have been anything!
2
out of
3 found this valuable.
Do you?
Keyword tags: None
(edit keyword tags)
|
||||
| Anya123 | I Agree | 0 | Apr 5 2008, 12:08 PM EDT by Anya123 | |
|
Thread started: Apr 5 2008, 12:08 PM EDT
Watch
I agree with Dictator-of-DOOM. Especailly the Loch Ness Monster.
|
||||
| Dictator-of-DOOM | I think | 7 | Apr 1 2008, 7:34 PM EDT by Dictator-of-DOOM | |
|
Thread started: Mar 28 2008, 10:14 PM EDT
Watch
I think we should hire some investigators to go get some real pictures. (Except the bigfoot one)
1
out of
3 found this valuable.
Do you?
Keyword tags: None
(edit keyword tags)
|
||||
